Team Tactics > www.fieldore.com

yeah sorry my abbreviations mightould have used a bit more explanation. I was just trying to see where heould possibly beoming from Poldarn. The wall of text laid out before me seemed somewhatlose to a rant and devoid of logal warlk (let alone mage) thought presses. To get bk to the OP a mage will shine in AOE grinding. In quk (but worrisome) levels and in dent, albeit, highly skillgear fused pvp. A warlk will shine in being mh easier to pk up. After you get your voidwalker and fear…people tend to get aomplex : P Deeps will be very high. Lks have a ne versatility where, unlike mages, all talent trees won’t look the same in the end. I love both my lk and my mage. Iame bk to the game after a long absee and you know what the first thing I wanted to pk up was? That is where a mage will shine IMHO
In early raids like kara and magtheridon, warlks provide solidC, mageC is inexistent in there. In normal instaes, I think sheep has the upper hand. Butome on, who tually still does 5 mans after kara started dropping badges? In raids, warlks and mages are all about straight forward dps. Mages put less strain on healers bause of mana gems andan e blk when they get in trouble. Warlksan life tap their mana bk, whh means that theyan go on until healer mana runs out. Warlks probably do more dps, or at least have more synergy with the rest of the raid then mages. Improved Shadowbolt debuff is a huge dps boost for shadow priests, and the imp provides an important tank buff. Magesan do the int buff and make mana biuits, IE: no reason to bring more then one mage. In reality, mage and warlk DPS is more or less equal, but due to the extra utility on warlks, I tend to prefer them over mages in my raids (though sheep is needed a lot in S from what I heard, we’re starting it this week). In pvp, warlks are a lot easier to play then mages, sie the important skills are instant, aside from fear. Mages have to sheep a lot, and then try to find time toast frostbolts. Lks get instantast dotsdebuffs, equalC (unable toC warriors, but I wouldn’t mind trading that for the ability toC druids), and will be doing damage no matter what happens. Mages are able to a lot of burst, and have lots ofooldowns, both defensive and offensive. Warlksan’t really burst as SLSL, but theyan keep going forever and take lower damage. Sounds pretty equal if I put it like this, but the truth is warlks are mh more efftive against a lot oflasses, mages only really have the upper hand against warriors, lks are better against all otherlasses. Warlks are probably more effient to grind with, unless you’d outgear everything as a mage. Right now Ian 2-3 hit kill prettymh everything non-elite, so no trouble there. AoE grinding didn’t get buffed with the quest exp buff, meaning warlks will level faster and moreomfortably. All the damage over time +c makes for dull play in pvp, but I doubt thatompensates for the amount of fun winning arena mahes is. In short: Doesn’t matter mh for pve, sie they’reomparable andompetitive. Warlk for pvp.